David versus Goliath Revisited:
The Great Cross Border Internet Pharmacy Debacle
By Louise Binder, Chair, CTAC
Spring 2007
Well, it is déjà vu all over again. The American government has
returned to its favourite neo-colonial strategy to solve its high
domestic drug pricing problems: purchasing Canadian drug supplies
for a steal, so to speak.
You may recall that this was a serious problem just before the last
U.S. election. Internet pharmacies had set up shop in Canada and
were filling and shipping to U.S. patients brand name prescription
drugs designated for Canadian patients. They were doing this
using prescriptions faxed by U.S. doctors to Canadian doctors for
co-signing.
No one involved in these ongoing transactions has clean hands.
The U.S. doctors know that the pharmacists filling the prescriptions
are not seeing the patients. The Canadian doctors know nothing
about the patients nor their conditions other than what is on the
prescriptions. The internet pharmacies know that they are not
filling a prescription properly signed by the patient’s doctor, and
that the doctor and the pharmacist should see the patient to provide
advice and counselling before handing the drug over.
They also know that manufacturers do not give Canadians unlimited
supplies of drugs, but rather allocate an amount based on an analysis
of reasonable Canadian use. Drugs sent across the border mean
fewer available for Canadian patients.
Why do American patients want to take potential risks and import
Canadian drugs? Because their drug prices are too high. Why
are they so high? Because the U.S. government does not regulate
brand name drug pricing and lets the free market system prevail.
In Canada, we created the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB)
to monitor and regulate drug prices. This is a trade off for the
patent protection (presently 20 years) afforded brand name drug
companies to recoup the cost of research and development of new drugs.
Removing this system of regulation would drive Canadian prices up,
putting even more drugs out of the reach of Canadians who badly need
them.
Americans like the result of our drug regulation: lower prices
for brand name drugs. In fact, it is the only part of the
Canadian system many Americans seem to like – as long as it stays in
Canada. They want to cherry pick the benefits of this part of our
system without recognizing that it is only one part of the fabric of
our healthcare system. To start pulling out this thread causes the
entire fabric to unravel. Or maybe that is too charitable, maybe they
understand perfectly well, but in true neo-colonial fashion, they just
do not care. And many American politicians go along with this band-aid
solution to avoid facing the real issue – their unregulated, expensive
drug market.
The controversy over cross border internet pharmacies seemed to take a
back seat for awhile as the Americans had bigger issues to resolve and
many Canadian internet pharmacy companies moved offshore.
Now it is back, with a vengeance. It started in September with a deal
struck in Congress and signed by the President to reopen the so-called
“foot traffic” personal importation of prescription drugs by American
patients. This is practical, however, only for people living in border
states.
Then came a series of events that effectively reopened all channels of
prescription drug importation to all U.S. patients. First, in October,
the Department of Homeland Security announced it would cease
confiscation by customs agents of prescription drugs mailed from
Canada. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was given back
this enforcement task, and the FDA admits it lacks the capacity to
effectively carry it out. Thus, via internet and mail order
sales, drugs from Canada are available to all Americans.
On January 10, 2007, these changes were consolidated into a new
legislative proposal in the new Democrat-controlled Congress. A
bipartisan Bill, the Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act
of 2007, has been introduced in both the Senate and the House of
Representatives. This Bill legalizes the importation of
prescription drugs from Canada by American patients, pharmacists and
drug wholesalers. That means the legalization of not only
personal importation by individual patients, but also the bulk
importation by health maintenance organizations, state drug plans and
other entities such as high volume retail chains. The Bill is
predicted to pass because congressional leaders claim to have enough
support in Congress to override a presidential veto.
It has serious and dangerous ramifications for both U.S. and Canadian
patients. We have not warned American patients of the problems of
counterfeit drugs, of improper prescribing by doctors and pharmacists
who have never seen the patients, of no counselling on the use of the
drugs nor contraindications. They tell us to mind our own
business. To be charitable, I understand that when you either
take these risks or forego lifesaving and life-enhancing drugs, you
take the risks. Even when we explain that we are allocated a
supply of drugs for Canada from drug manufacturers that cannot meet
more than one month’s supply for the U.S. market, they are unmoved
because of their dire need.
What are the dangers for Canadian patients? They are grave.
Manufacturers will not supply unlimited amounts of drugs to
Canada. If it is clear that drugs allocated for the Canadian
market are being diverted to the higher-priced U.S. market, the tap
will be shut off. We could very quickly find drug shortages for
Canadians across the country. For some, it is quite simply a
question of life and death. For others, it will mean a profoundly
reduced quality of life. This is simply intolerable.
In the longer run, there could be a strong pressure on Canada to
deregulate drug prices and to create a North American drug price,
namely the high U.S. price. American governments and the
pharmaceutical industry have long hoped for this result. It is
simply unacceptable.
Cross border trade in Canadian prescription drugs to the U.S. has the
potential to be have a devastating effect on access to badly needed
medications for Canadians. This would most hurt those of us most
in need, including people with HIV and coinfections.
What can you do about this? Well, we cannot stop the Americans
from doing whatever it is they will do to avoid taking responsibility
for this domestic problem. We can, however, demand that our
politicians at both the federal and provincial levels use their
legislative powers to ban internet pharmacies. Write to them to
demand immediate action, so they are not scrambling to react once the
horses are out of the barn.
We can also demand that provincial medical associations severely punish
doctors who sign prescriptions for patients that are not their own.
And we can demand that pharmaceutical companies commit to ensure that
no Canadian patient is forced to go without needed medication because
of this practice. After all, it is not our fault that the U.S. is
treating Canada as its personal medicine cabinet.
Act now. Your health is at stake.